Arsenal make improved offer for Lisandro Martinez

Arsenal have now made an improved offer for Ajax defender Lisandro Martinez, according to journalist Cesar Luis Merlo.

The Lowdown: Arteta’s interest

The 24-year-old has been the subject of heavy interest from the North London club, with the Argentina international seemingly Gunners boss Mikel Arteta’s first choice defensive target.

Indeed, The Athletic previously reported that Arsenal had a £26m bid rejected by the Amsterdam outfit, and it was said that they were likely to return with a better offer for the centre-half, who can also be utilised at left-back.

The Latest: Merlo’s news

Merlo has shared the latest news regarding Arsenal’s pursuit of Martinez, who is now receiving interest from Premier League rivals Manchester United.

Taking to Twitter, the journalist confirmed that second bid has now arrived:

“Manchester United is very interested in Lisandro Martínez, but has not yet made an official offer.

“Arsenal have improved their proposal to €40M + 5 in bonuses, but Ajax have not responded yet.

 “He is on vacation: he is happy in Netherlands but he is seduced by going to the big Premier League.”

The Verdict: Great signing

Analysing Martinez’s underlying stats, it is easy to see why Arteta is so keen on signing the Ajax defender.

When compared with positional peers across Europe over the past year, the 24-year-old ranks in the 99th percentile for assists, shot-creating actions, passes attempted, progressive passes and tackles (via FB Ref), proving to be an aggressive defender but with immense ability on the ball.

Described as an ‘incredible signing’ at the Johan Cruijff ArenA by popular Ajax writer TheEuropeanLad, Martinez’s arrival at the Emirates would certainly excite supporters, given the obvious talent he would radiate in Arsenal’s back-line.

Hopefully, then, the second bid is enough to get a deal over the line in time for the beginning of the new season.

Spurs: Romano delivers Bastoni update

There has been a fresh twist in Tottenham Hotspur’s pursuit of Inter Milan defender, Alessandro Bastoni…

What’s the word?

According to journalist Fabrizio Romano, the Italy international won’t be making the move to north London this summer, with the 23-year-old seemingly set to stay on at the San Siro.

[snack-amp-story url= “https://www.footballfancast.com/web-stories/read-the-latest-spurs-news-transfer-rumours-gossip-much-more” title= “Read the latest Spurs news, transfer rumours and more!”]

In an interview with a German media outlet (via The Mirror), the transfer guru stated that: “Alessandro Bastoni was a top target, but he remains with Inter. Milan Skriniar would have the opportunity to leave. Maybe to move to PSG, who are ahead at the moment. But Bastoni is a really complicated matter.”

The recent suggestion had been that Spurs were keen on securing a deal for the 15-cap gem, with the club said to be targeting a new left-sided centre-back in the current window, with the likes of Pau Torres and RB Leipzig’s Joskvo Gvardiol also reported targets, as per Romano.

Conte fuming

Antonio Conte is typically a manager that likes to get what he wants in the transfer window, hence his undoubted anger that the Lilywhites will be unable to bring one of his top targets to the Premier League this summer.

Even after sporting director Fabio Paratici had worked astutely to add Dejan Kulusevski and Rodrigo Bentancur to his squad in January, the former Chelsea boss was still critical of the club’s overall transfer dealings, with the Italian seemingly a hard man to please when it comes to recruitment.

With the aid of a £150m cash injection, however, the Spurs hierarchy are seemingly willing to invest significantly to help the serial-winning coach assemble a squad capable of challenging both domestically and in Europe next term, having already completed three major deals thus far this summer.

It appears that Bastoni won’t be joining that list, however, with that set to be a clear source of frustration for the man in the dugout, with Conte having worked with the left-footed defender during his recent stint in Italy.

In Inter’s title-winning campaign in the 2020/21 season, the £54m-rated ace averaged an impressive 2.2 clearances, 1.2 interceptions and 1.1 tackles per game from his 33 league outings, proving himself a vital asset on the left of the 52-year-old’s back-three system.

The £122k-per-week colossus has kicked on again this term in the absence of his former boss, showcasing his ball-playing talents as he ranks in the top 1% for progressive passes received, as well as in the top 11% for progressive carries and the top 15% for progressive passes among his peers across Europe’s top five leagues.

Having the chance to add that impressive, familiar face to his squad at Tottenham would no doubt have been firmly on the mind of the one-time Juventus coach, yet now he will be left chasing other targets who may take longer to adapt to his relentless style.

AND in other news: Fabrizio Romano now reveals “very advanced” talks, Spurs supporters will be gutted

Tottenham submit offer for Djed Spence

According to journalist Jacque Talbot, Tottenham Hotspur have made an offer for Middlesbrough defender Djed Spence amid competition from Nottingham Forest.

The Lowdown: Interest since April

During April, it was reported that more than 10 clubs had declared their interest in signing the 21-year-old, who was impressing in the Championship whilst on loan at Forest.

Bundesliga giants Bayern Munich even sent scouts to watch the right-back play at the City Ground, although it has since been reported that Steve Cooper’s side, along with Spurs and Arsenal, lead the race to secure the youngster’s signature.

The Latest: Talbot’s news on Spence

Taking to Twitter, Talbot has now shared the latest news involving Spence’s potential destination ahead of next season.

He claimed: “Exc: Understand that Tottenham have put in an offer for Djed Spence but that Nottingham Forest are involved as well. Allure of European football will be the only thing standing in the way of Spence and Forest continuing their relationship next season.”

In a subsequent tweet, Talbot added: “Contrary to reports, Spence has not definitively chosen to join Spurs. Conte’s side are one of the clubs with a huge foot in the door.”

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/tottenham-latest-developments-2/” title=”Tottenham latest developments!” poster=”” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

The Verdict: Get it done

Whilst Spence clearly has a good relationship with Forest manager Cooper after their promotion to the Premier League, the pull of Antonio Conte and Champions League football could yet entice the youngster to the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium.

This would be a good addition for the north Londoners, given Conte’s preference to play attacking wing-backs and the 21-year-old’s ability to bomb up and down the flanks.

Ian Wright even claimed that one of Spence’s displays in the FA Cup was “one of the best right back performances” he had seen in a very long time, raising comparisons with “unbelievable” full-backs such as Reece James and Trent Alexander-Arnold.

Therefore, Paratici should do anything he can to get this deal done.

In other news: Journalist drops Lautaro Martinez to Spurs transfer claim

West Ham interested in Giovanni Simeone

West Ham United are believed to keen on Argentine striker Giovanni Simeone, according to reports in Italy.

What’s the word?

As per Wednesday’s edition of newspaper Corriere di Verona (via Sports Witness), the Hammers have been named as one of the clubs who are keeping tabs on the 26-year-old, with a summer move seemingly on the cards for the five-cap international.

The forward spent the most recent campaign on loan at Serie A side outfit Hellas Verona from parent club Cagliari, although is expected to move on in the upcoming window even if his temporary switch is made permanent.

[snack-amp-story url= “https://www.footballfancast.com/web-stories/read-this-weeks-latest-west-ham-news-transfer-rumours-gossip-and-more” title= “Read the latest West Ham news!”]

Verona are believed to be able to complete the signing for a fee of around €10.5m (£8.9m), although will then likely sell him on for profit, with both West Ham and Newcastle United potentially set to pounce.

Better than Antonio

The former Fiorentina man – who is the son of Atletico Madrid boss, Diego – has put himself on the radar of a number of clubs across Europe following his remarkable goalscoring spree in the 2021/22 campaign.

In 35 league outings in the Italian top-flight, the £15.3m-rated marksman netted an impressive 17 goals while also laying on a further five assists, with only three players having scored more goals in the division.

Such form has also seen the £47k-per-week ace compare favourably to those in his position across Europe’s top five leagues, with the “fearless” forward – as he has been described by journalist Martin Mazur – ranking in the top 11% for non-penalty goals, while also showcasing his defensive qualities as he ranks in the top 7% for blocks and the top 16% for pressures made.

Although never truly prolific prior to this latest season, such a sensational season is hard to ignore, with the Madrid-born star potentially the man to fill the striking void at the London Stadium.

The Hammers currently have just Michail Antonio as their only senior, recognised centre-forward – having failed to replace club-record flop Sebastian Haller – with the Jamaica international himself admitting the need for increased competition.

Despite an early flurry at the start of the season, the 30-year-old has rubberstamped the belief that he is not a long-term fit to lead the line, enduring a notable dry spell in 2022 in which he scored just three league goals following the turn of the year.

His total tally of 13 goals in all competitions is his best return in a season for the club, although that remains a relatively underwhelming figure for a number nine, particularly when compared to Simeone’s haul last term.

Also – somewhat surprisingly – Antonio ranks poorly for his defensive work compared to the potential new arrival, ranking in just the top 47% for pressures made and the top 51% for blocks made.

That’s not to suggest that Moyes and co should dispense with him this summer, although a quality replacement is needed if the east Londoners are to really kick on next season, with Simeone seemingly the man for the job.

IN other news, GSB plotting bid for £13.5m-rated “revelation”, he could be West Ham’s next Sinclair 

Celtic set to secure Carter-Vickers deal

Celtic are on the verge of securing the SPFL title this season for the first time under Ange Postecoglou’s reign in charge of the club.

With 86 points on the board from 35 league games, the Hoops have scored 81 goals and conceded just 20.

Looking ahead to the upcoming summer transfer window, it seems as though a big clue has appeared regarding one potential deal that could take place at Lennoxtown that would surely have the Celtic boss jumping for joy.

What’s the talk?

Speaking to Football Insider, Tottenham Hotspur insider John Wenham had this to say about the possibility of Celtic securing a permanent transfer deal for their on-loan defender Cameron Carter-Vickers this summer.

He said: “It seems like Carter-Vickers is going to go early doors. Quite where that is yet, I’m not sure. Some new names have been mentioned in the last few days.

“If I’m being totally honest, I think Celtic will speak to Tottenham and say they will pay the money on 1 July. If they just say, ‘let’s get it done early and here is £6m that goes up to £10m with add-ons’, Tottenham would take that all day.

“I know from speaking to people who know his agency, we would have taken £2.5m last summer. So, to get a much-improved fee would be something Tottenham wouldn’t think twice about. The deal is done quickly and no one has to worry about it again.”

Great news for Postecoglou

Celtic signed the defender from the north London club on loan until the end of the season back in the previous summer transfer window.

Since then, the American has become a pivotal figure for the Hoops, making 42 appearances across all competitions.

With 30 SPFL appearances under his belt, the Spurs loanee has earned himself an overall performance rating of 7.33/10 from WhoScored, making him the fourth-highest rated player in Postecoglou’s squad.

From a defensive point of view, the 24-year-old has the joint-highest number of interceptions (38) from a Celtic player in the SPFL, highlighting just how crucial he’s been at the back.

This all shows just how much of a great move it was from the Bhoys to bring the centre-back to Parkhead last summer.

Moving forward, if what Wenham claims ends up being true, this would definitely be great news for Postecoglou and his chances of being successful with the Parkhead club moving forward.

In other news: Brown 2.0: Ange can save millions with rarely-seen Celtic gem who’s the “real deal”

The lowdown on Kyle Jamieson

All your questions on New Zealand’s new 6ft 8in pace and bounce man answered

Deivarayan Muthu30-Jan-2020Jamieson is the tallest NZ cricketerAt six feet and eight inches (2.03 metre), Jamieson is the tallest cricketer in New Zealand. Believe it or not, he’s slightly taller than New Zealand’s batting coach two-metre Peter Fulton, and he has been using his towering frame to bounce out batsmen in domestic cricket.Jamieson was born in Auckland, bred in Canterbury, and is now in line to make his New Zealand debut, having sparkled for New Zealand A.

He has been called up to the Test squad before, right?Indeed, he had been picked as a replacement for the injured Ferguson for the 2019 Boxing Day Test because of his propensity to run in hard and hit the deck harder, but he didn’t get a game on that horror tour of Australia.Jamieson, though, has been a regular for New Zealand A over the past few seasons and was even part of the squad that travelled to the UAE in 2018. In all, he has represented New Zealand A 13 times across formats, picking up 15 wickets. His best figures of 4 for 49 came in his most recent A game against India A in Christchurch. Jamieson dismissed opener Ruturaj Gaikwad, Suryakumar Yadav and then defended seven off the last over to secure the one-day series 2-1 for the hosts. He nipped out Sandeep Warrier and Ishan Porel off back-to-back balls to finish off India’s chase.Earlier, in the 2014 Under-19 World Cup in the UAE, Jamieson had emerged as New Zealand’s second-highest wicket-taker, with seven strikes in four matches at an economy rate of 4.51.ALSO READ: Firebird Bennett ready for his NZ rebirthWhat’s his biggest claim to fame?A bowler in the mould of Morne Morkel, Jamieson bagged 6 for 7 at Eden Park – the best figures by a New Zealand bowler and the fourth-best overall in T20 cricket – in last season’s Super Smash for Canterbury. He bounced out four of Auckland’s batsmen, including their England recruit James Vince. He can also get the ball to swing – like he showed when he snatched the outside edge of Mark Chapman on that day.Jamieson switched to Auckland prior to this season, and is the top wicket-taker in the Super Smash in the past two years. He has bagged 30 wickets in 16 matches at an economy rate of 8.08. However, the more experienced Hamish Bennett was preferred ahead of him for the T20Is against India largely because Bennett has more variations.Jamieson has been on the fringes for a while, having been among the wickets in the one-day Ford Trophy and the four-day Plunket Shield as well.Can he bat?He sure can as his List A average (31.50) and strike rate (112.50) suggest. He has made three first-class fifties to go with one in List A cricket. His most memorable knock came against the visiting English attack in 2018, when he cracked a 111-ball 101 to give the likes of James Anderson, Stuart Broad and Mark Wood a runaround in a warm-up at Seddon Park.What they say about him…“An impressive bowler who at 6ft 8in can swing it… another one to add to the @BLACKCAPS stable.”
“Kyle impressed the coaching staff in his time with the Test squad for the Melbourne and Sydney Tests, and will feel comfortable in the environment if included.”

Time to allow dressing-room reviews?

Dilruwan Perera’s bizarre review in Kolkata highlighted the inconsistencies in the DRS protocol, so why not eliminate that doubt by allowing players to get help from the dressing room?

Karthik Krishnaswamy23-Nov-2017Imagine this. At a critical moment in a finely balanced Ashes Test or India-Australia match, a batsman is given out lbw to a ball that nips back into him. He proceeds to walk a few steps towards his dressing room, only to turn abruptly and ask for a review. Replays show ball striking pad outside off stump. The umpire has to reverse his decision.Imagine the uproar from the opposition, the media noise, and the spillover of all that bad blood into the remainder of the series.There was no uproar or bad blood when Dilruwan Perera survived an lbw decision in this manner on Sunday at Eden Gardens, in a Test match that was delicately poised at that point. Sri Lanka denied that there had been any signal from the dressing room to Dilruwan. Their statement said he had turned around because he heard Rangana Herath, at the other end, ask Nigel Llong whether Sri Lanka had any reviews left, and heard Llong reply in the affirmative. India didn’t make a fuss about it either.Imagine this now. Almost exactly the same thing happens, in a finely balanced Ashes Test or India-Australia match, except this time the on-field umpire has spotted someone in the dressing room gesturing to the batsman to turn around and ask for a review. The umpire tells the batsman he cannot review, and he walks off. Replays, once again, show the ball striking back pad outside off stump.In this instance, has the DRS protocol prevented the correct decision from being arrived at?Extend the argument a little further: is it necessarily wrong for a batsman or fielding team to seek assistance from the dressing room, if in the process the right decision can be made?Given that the review must be asked for within 15 seconds of the original decision, it doesn’t allow enough time for the occupants of the dressing room to have watched replays. They would have watched the action live, and after about a second’s delay on TV, from a behind-the-bowler view not available to anyone on the field. Would that not mean they are better placed to advise the batsman or fielding captain on whether to take a review than the non-striker or wicketkeeper?The question leads us to the tension that lies at the heart of the Decision Review System.We hear it often, and the ICC maintains this position, that the DRS exists in order to minimise “howlers”, or obviously wrong decisions – an inside-edge onto pad that the umpire has missed, or a caught-behind given when the ball has brushed elbow guard rather than glove.With that in mind, it’s clear why players aren’t allowed to take dressing-room assistance while deciding whether to review. It’s unlikely a batsman would not know that he’s inside-edged onto pad, or strongly suspect that the ball pitched outside leg stump. In these cases, the batsman really wouldn’t need to look at the dressing room for help.In Dilruwan’s case, the decision was marginal: the ball struck his back pad half an inch outside off stump. In the old days before DRS, commentators would call it a close but fair decision, and leave it at that.Players, however, don’t use the DRS only to reverse obviously wrong decisions. The bulk of reviews are of marginal calls, made on the basis of hope rather than belief: balls that may or may not have hit or off stump or clipped the bails; balls that struck a batsman’s pad while he was moving across the stumps, where impact could have occurred in line or just outside; balls that could have pitched on or outside leg stump, give or take a tiny fraction.As a result, most of the ICC’s tinkering with the DRS has focused on marginal decisions. Last year, the definition of “hitting the stumps” for ball-tracking calls was amended, which meant some marginal lbw reviews that earlier reverted to the on-field umpire’s call now fell within the realms of definitely being out. This year, teams have been allowed to retain reviews that return an “umpire’s call” verdict.The latter decision – only mildly counterbalanced by the decision to end the topping-up of reviews at the 80-over mark in Test cricket – directly incentivises players to review marginal calls, moving the DRS another step away from its stated aim.In this climate, therefore, it seems arbitrary that players can’t ask their dressing room for help with reviews. When batsmen can question entirely reasonable umpiring decisions because they are now at less risk of losing reviews, why not let them get some extra help while they’re at it? It could even open up the job market for specialist DRS consultants.

Amla does a de Villiers

Plays of the day from the tri-series match between West Indies and South Africa in St Kitts

Firdose Moonda15-Jun-2016Hashim de VilliersHashim Amla enjoyed his most fluent innings of the tour so far, decorated with powerful pulls and silken drives. After he reached his hundred, Amla brought out a shot that did not seem to be part of his repertoire before this innings. With his confidence soaring, Amla walked across his stumps to a full delivery from Jerome Taylor, bent down on one knee, and scooped it to fine leg for four. AB de Villiers has been known to pull off moves like that, not Amla. Perhaps, the opener has been taking lessons from his captain.Can the real No.3 please stand up? South Africa’s openers could not have laid a more perfect platform for the world’s top-ranked ODI batsman – a stand of 182 in 33 overs. But after Amla’s lofted drive found long-off instead of clearing the boundary, it was not de Villiers or regular No.3 Faf du Plessis or even either of the other two recognised batsmen JP Duminy or Farhaan Behardien who walked out. Instead, South Africa sent in allrounder Chris Morris, who was returning from a hamstring niggle, to contribute quick runs. Morris repaid their faith with 40 off 26 balls.Umpire in danger Non-strikers have to be careful of being on the receiving end of an aggressive throw and now it seems even umpires are at risk. Nigel Llong was almost taken out by Carlos Brathwaite, whose frustration boiled over as South Africa built their total. Brathwaite returned for a second spell in the 39th over and put the brakes on the South African charge, hoping to make a breakthrough. When Morris thought of stealing a run after playing the ball straight back to him, Brathwaite reacted quickly to try and run out du Plessis at the non-striker’s end. Du Plessis was wary of the danger but Llong was not and Brathwaite’s hurl almost hurt him. Luckily, he skipped out of the way and Morris got his run.Umpire in greater danger Llong escaped easily when considering what happened to his counterpart, Gregory Brathwaite, in the second innings. Johnson Charles was leading West Indies’ chase and drilled a Morris delivery down the ground, so hard that it broke a stump a non-striker’s end. The rogue piece cartwheeled away and almost hit Brathwaite, who eventually did well to get out of the way. Charles did not get his run, and nobody was injured.Fastest slow bowler Imran Tahir’s trademark running-for-joy celebration has been the subject of numerous plays of the day over the 58 ODIs he has appeared in but none of them mattered more than this one. When Marlon Samuels tried to cut a regulation legbreak and got a thick outside edge to Quinton de Kock instead, Tahir had a real reason to take off around the ground. That wicket was his 100th in the format, which made him the fastest South African to the milestone and fourth fastest overall. It was also the scalp that ended any realistic chance of West Indies successfully chasing the target of 344.

Pakistan, WI and Ireland in numbers game

Here’s what the teams need to do to go through to the quarter-finals

S Rajesh14-Mar-2015The four-week group stage of the World Cup is almost over, but with only two matches left, a couple of spots are still up for grabs in Pool B. Pakistan, Ireland, and West Indies are in contention to take the last two places in the group. If Cyclone Pam arrives earlier than expected and washes out West Indies’ last match, against UAE, then Pakistan and Ireland will sail through regardless of the result of that match. If however, West Indies win that game, things will get more interesting in the group. Here’s what the teams need to do to go through to the quarter-finals:Pakistan
Pakistan are the best placed of the three teams, as they already have six points, and the best net run rate among the three. If they win, they are through as the third-placed team in the group and will play Australia in Adelaide; if they lose and if West Indies win, the team with the better NRR will make the next stage as the fourth team, and will play New Zealand in Wellington.The result margins that will work for Pakistan
Given that Pakistan’s current NRR is -0.194, and West Indies’ is -0.511, Pakistan have some margins to play with, even if they lose and West Indies win.If for instance, West Indies score 300 against UAE and win by 50 runs, Pakistan, chasing Ireland’s 300, will need to score at least 274 to ensure their NRR stays ahead of West Indies’.If West Indies chase a target of 251 in 40, Pakistan, after scoring 250, will have to ensure that Ireland take at least 46 overs to chase it down.However, if West Indies win by an even bigger margin – around 75 or more runs when batting first, or with around 81 balls to spare when batting second (depending on the actual scores) – then their NRR will improve to such an extent that Pakistan will need a win or a tie.West Indies
To begin with, West Indies need to beat UAE to have any chance of qualifying. A win will lift them to six points, and if Pakistan beat Ireland, West Indies will qualify as the fourth team regardless of the result margins, as Ireland’s NRR is well below West Indies’. If Ireland beat Pakistan, though, the result margins will come into play.The result margins that will work for West Indies
If West Indies score 300 and win by 50 runs, and Ireland score 300 batting first, West Indies will have to hope that Pakistan fold for 273 or fewer, so that their NRR slips below West Indies’. Similarly, if West Indies chase down a target of 251 in 40, they’ll want Ireland to chase a similar target in 45.5 or fewer overs.If West Indies win by an even bigger margin – around 75 or more runs when batting first, or by around 81 balls to spare when batting second (depending on the actual scores) – then their NRR will improve to such an extent that an Ireland win by any margin will suffice to push Pakistan out.Ireland
Ireland have done superbly to win three games, but their problem is their poor net run rate, which is by far the worst among the three. That means they need to beat Pakistan, or hope that West Indies don’t get two points from their game against UAE. If West Indies beat UAE and Ireland lose to Pakistan – by any margin – Pakistan and West Indies will make it through to the next stage.

Fading light, unfading resolve

A reduced dependence on the big stars and the confidence derived from past successes are driving Bangladesh’s progress

Mohammad Isam in Fatullah03-Nov-2013Bangladesh’s successful 308-run chase in Fatullah brought to mind some previous instances where they faltered, but there remained a sense of inevitability about it all. Even when the light was fading at 4:20pm and the floodlights began to flicker, the batsmen didn’t seem in awe of the atmosphere or hurried by the match situation. It was almost as if they knew they wouldn’t fail.The 300-plus chase, the stringing together of partnerships, playing in fading light and an almost predictable conclusion are, however, not very new to the Bangladesh team. Three matches from the recent past have presented each of these situations to them, and the team have had mixed results. The obvious one is the successful 313-run chase against Zimbabwe in 2009, where Tamim Iqbal recorded the country’s highest ODI score.The partnerships were a reminder of Bangladesh’s win over India in the 2012 Asia Cup, where Tamim and Jahurul Islam provided a 113-run second-wicket stand after which Shakib Al Hasan and Nasir Hossain turned the game with an eight-over burst that yielded 64.The sense of inevitability almost certainly came from the point at which Bangladesh realised they were going to crush New Zealand 4-0 in 2010. In the final match of that series, they were defending only 174 and, despite a dangerous partnership developing between Daniel Vettori and Grant Elliott, the players didn’t seem too fazed. At that point, Shafiul Islam swooped in from deep midwicket to take a diving catch to dismiss Vettori, who stood between Bangladesh and history.The fading light situation in Fatullah brought to mind the valiant Mushfiqur hundred in Harare in 2011. Bangladesh were desperately trying to avoid going down 3-0 in the five-match ODI series, having already lost the one-off Test match by 130 runs.Mushfiqur brought out different versions of his slog sweep, and kept on connecting in near darkness. For those who watched that innings in the freezing cold, there is still a sense of wonder how he batted under so much pressure in those conditions. The press box and the restaurant at the ground had full lighting, and the camera flashes were noticeable when Chris Mpofu ran in to bowl at Mushfiqur, who was shielding the tail at that point too. He was finally caught trying to hit the winning runs, and he cried his way all the way into the dressing-room.There were no tears today under the Fatullah floodlights as the insects swarmed in the evening while the Bangladesh players celebrated minus a trophy (it will be presented on Wednesday after the Twenty20 match).Best of all, however, there were six important partnerships which is a major sign of the improvement in batting while chasing a total, and dependency on all the specialist batsmen rather than just one or two.Shamsur Rahman and Ziaur Rahman started off the Bangladesh innings like they do in the Dhaka Premier League for Mohammedan Sporting Club and Prime Bank respectively. Ziaur didn’t look great when his slogs didn’t connect, but when they did, Bangladesh were ensured an initial thrust at the expense of the young New Zealand bowlers.Mominul Haque once again began brightly before being dismissed after a quick 32, but he too added a vital 65 for the second wicket with Shamsur. Naeem Islam then joined Shamsur and the pair, both second choice as far as selection ahead of the ODI series was concerned, changed the course of the game further. Nasir Hossain was unbeaten in a Bangladesh chase for the fourth time in his short career, as he tackled the final bend with a calm head. He now averages a staggering 117 in successful chases, at a more than healthy strike rate of 88.30.The Bangladesh team’s leadership group is slowly tightening the batting line-up by cutting out a specialist batsman at No 8. Two things have resulted from this: the knowledge that each of the seven has to score to win, and Sohag Gazi has to become a batting option. But it is ultimately a change in mentality for a team like Bangladesh.They have now gathered enough memory, muscle or otherwise, from the past that they know exactly how to react in all situations of a one-day game. Of course they don’t play as much, but each of these past instances have been scrutinised whether it ended up as a success or not. And they are a settled line-up these days, which gives the players the cushion to be themselves rather than always be in a hurry and try something different.Nasir’s calmness towards the end was perhaps predictable, but the way Shamsur and Naeem batted in the middle-overs, and the fact that Bangladesh won both times when Shakib and Tamim were not in the team in completed matches, says a lot about the progress of the Bangladesh team in the last four weeks.